MIC announces New Competition Promotion Program 2010
Having taken into consideration the changes in market environment resulting from the progress in the shift to IP, such as the advances in the move to broadband, the transition from PSTN (public switched telephone network) to IP (Internet Protocol) networks, and the diversification of business models, MIC is looking to promote greater competition in the telecommunications market and improve user benefits. In order to do this, MIC has formulated a “New Competition Promotion Program 2010” concerning measures to be implemented from the point of view of putting in place fair competition rules by the beginning of the 2010 decade.
Revision of Asia Broadband Program
The Program, which is based on the e-Japan Priority Policy Program-2002 (Decision of Strategic Headquarters for the Promotion of an Advanced Information and Telecommunications Network Society, June 18, 2002), and Basic Policies for Economic and Fiscal Policy Management and Structural Reform 2002 (Cabinet Decision of June 25, 2002), was defined by the MIC and concerned government ministries on March 28, 2003, as an action plan to put in place a broadband environment in Asia.
In order to put in place a broadband environment in Asia, MIC and concerned government ministries are taking various measures based on the Program.
In accordance with the Program, reviews are conducted taking into consideration progress in diffusion of broadband platforms in Asia and implemention status of measures proposed in it, MIC and concerned government ministries have revised the Program having taken these conditions into account.
The Program aims to activate the flow of information within Asia and to make Asia as a whole a global information hub by 2010.
In the future, MIC and concerned government ministries plan to work actively, in cooperation with other Asian governments, NPOs and international organizations, based on the revised Program, with a view to putting in place a broadband environment in Asia.
Web site for further reference
Asia Broadband Program Website http://www.dosite.jp/asia-bb/en/index.html
Revision of the Asia Broadband Program (Outline)Outline of Revision of the Asia Broadband Program (overall structure)
Outline of Revision of Asia Broadband Program (I Basic Concepts)
Outline of Revision of Asia Broadband Program (II Goals)
Outline of Revision of Asia Broadband Program (III Measures to be taken)
Outline of Revision of Asia Broadband Program (III Measures: Principal New Major Points 1)
Outline of Revision of Asia Broadband Program (III Measures: Principal New Major Points 2)
Outline of the Report on a Framework for Competition Rules to Address the Transition to IP-Based Networks
MIC set up the Study Group on a Framework for Competition Rules to Address the Transition to IP-Based Networks on October 28, 2005. The group studied a framework for an interconnection and tariff policy and compiled a final report in September 2006 (http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_sosiki/joho_tsusin/eng/pdf/060926_1.pdf) with consideration of comments from 44 parties.
Table of contents for draft reportChapter 1 - Changes in the competitive environment in the transition to IP-based networks and the necessity for revising competition rules
1. Changes in the competitive environments in the transition to IP-based networks
(1) The spread of broadband
(2) Development of horizontal market integration
(3) Development of vertical market integration
2. The necessity for a revision of competition rules to address the transition to IP-based networks
1. Basic principles for competition rules in the transition to IP-based networks
(1) Ensuring fair competition at the telecommunications layer (comprising the physical network layer and the telecommunications service layer)
(2) Ensuring fair competition focusing on the vertical integration business model
(3) Ensuring competitive and technological neutrality
(4) Protecting consumer interests
(5) Ensuring that competition rules are flexible, transparent and consistent
2. Time frames for the consideration
1. Appropriate balance between facility-based competition and service-based competition
(1) Basic concept
(2) Market environment and competition policy in Europe and the United States
(3) Approaches to promoting facility-based competition
2. Basic viewpoints concerning interconnection policy
(1) Background of interconnection policy
(2) Basic policy direction of interconnection policy
3. A framework for designated telecommunications facilities system
(1) Viewpoints for consideration
(2) Criteria for designated telecommunications facilities system
(3) Mid-term management strategy for the NTT Group and a framework for the designated telecommunications facilities system
(4) Flexible review of the coverage of designated telecommunications facilities
(5) Establishment of “competition safeguard systems”
(6) Comprehensive review of the designated telecommunications facilities system
(7) Other tasks to be considered
4. A framework for ensuring a competitive environment as to NTT East and West’ s next-generation networks (NGNs)
(1) The need to ensure the openness of next-generation networks constructed by NTT East and West
(2) How studies should proceed
(3) Subjects to note
5. Revision of the accounting system related to Type I designated facilities
(1) Revision of interconnection accounting standards that address the changes in market structure
(2) Direction of studies
6. A framework for calculating interconnection charges
(1) A framework for PSTNs interconnection charges
(2) A framework of optical fiber interconnection charges
(3) Other topics that should be studied
7. Approach to Coping with the Diversification of Interconnection Types
(1) Topics that should be studied
(2) Directions for studies
8. A framework for the promotion of competition in the mobile communication markets including MVNOs
(1) Effects of promoting competition from MVNOs’ entrance
(2) The relationship between MNO and MVNO
(3) Future approaches in looking ahead to promoting MVNO’ s entrance
1. Basic viewpoints concerning tariff policy
2. A framework for price cap regulations
(1) Dynamic changes in the import of systems and in market structures
(2) The need for revising systems
3. A framework for new tariff structures
(1) Formulating guidelines concerning inappropriate cases with regard to setting tariffs
(2) Revision of telecommunication business
(3) Preserving user advantage in the face of the growing variety of tariffs
1. Changes in network structure and network neutrality
(1) Basic rules for network neutrality
(2) Network neutrality as a parameter of policy evaluation
2. Equal access to networks
(1) Openness of interface between layers
(2) Ensuring openness relating to top layer
(3) Maintaining openness relating to the bottom (terminal) layer
3. Equitable cost distribution of networks
(1) The need for boosting communications networks to handle the sharp increase in IP traffic
(2) A framework for the market mechanism and cost sharing
4. The debate in the U. S. regarding network neutrality
5. A framework for studies
1. A framework for promoting competition at the terminal layer
(1) Putting in place a competition environment concerning the functions of terminals in response to the move to IP
(2) Promoting competition in the mobile terminal market
2. Strengthening dispute settlement functions
(1) Flexible revision of the range of the parties concerned in disputes
(2) Revision of the range of dispute settlement cases
(3) Amendment of opinion submission system
3. Revision of universal service system
(1) The need to revise the universal service system in conjunction with the move to IP
(2) Basic viewpoints of reference on the occasion of the revision
(3) Study schedule for the revision
4. Clarification of the market exit rules
5. Other actions required of government
(1) Ensuring the transparency of competition rules
(2) Deliberating on the future of telecommunications numbering systems
(3) Addressing issues at the international level, such as international disputes over peering
(4) Ensuring that domestic competition rules are consistent with the international marketplace
Final report from the Study Group on Countermeasures against Illegal/Harmful Information on the Internet
On August 1, 2005, MIC set up the Study Group on Countermeasures against Illegal/Harmful Information on the Internet to deliberate upon 1) voluntary countermeasures to be taken by providers against illegal/harmful information on the Internet, and ii) ways and means to support these effectively
Following the compilation of a final draft report by the study group, MIC invited public comments from June 30 to July 21, 2006, and received 39 comments during that period.
The study group has recently compiled and announced its final report, having taken these comments into consideration.
OutlineBackground to setting up the study group
Whereas the rapid development and penetration of the Internet has brought great convenience to users, the flow of illegal/harmful information on the Internet has become a social problem.
MIC compiled the conclusions of the government regarding countermeasures to illegal/harmful information on the Internet, and having announced these on June 30, 2005, set up the Study Group on Countermeasures against Illegal/Harmful Information on the Internet in August. The group would mainly investigate voluntary countermeasures by providers and electronic bulletin board administrators and ways to support their effective application.
The illegal information referred to here is information that breaks the law and harms the rights of others or their interests as protected by the law, whereas harmful information is information that, while not being illegal, could endanger public safety and order, and cause harm to specific people.Outline of investigation
With regard to harmful/illegal information on the Internet, in addition to countermeasures against the senders (arresting those transmitting illegal information) and countermeasures by recipients (information filtering by recipients), there are cases when measures can be taken by those offering the platform for the flow of information, such as ISPs (providers) and electronic bulletin board administrators, with dispositions such as measures to actually stop transmissions. The study group carried out its investigations principally around the discussion points listed below, on ways to promote voluntary countermeasures by ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators.
Topics investigated by the study group
(1) The criminal liability of ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators who have left other people’ s illegal information posted up.
(2) Voluntary countermeasures by ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators to deal with illegal information on the Internet, and measures to support these.
(3) Voluntary countermeasures by ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators to deal with harmful information on the Internet, and measures to support these.
(4) The operation of disclosure of sender information within the law of providersf responsibility
(5) Anonymity on the Internet
(6) Information transmitted from overseas
1. Limitations in countermeasures by ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators
Technical limitations in countermeasures by ISPs and electronic bulletin board administrators were sorted on the premise of investigating voluntary measures, and investigations were carried out concerning measures to stop transmissions, by those who are able to deal with individual input or data files such as administrators of electronic bulletin boards or servers who are managing data files or servers (referred to below as “electronic bulletin board administrators”).
In addition, since there is a large volume of new illegal and harmful information that flows into the Internet each day, and it is possible to upload the information on which transmission stoppage measures have been taken onto a different server, there are limits to countermeasures by electronic bulletin board administrators.
Taking the above into consideration, it is vitally important that harmful/illegal information should be dealt with both by measures against the senders (arresting senders of illegal information) and measures by recipients (filtering of information by recipients). In particular, it is necessary to actively promote filtering of information by recipients since it avoids legal issues as it is the choice of the recipient, and it allows for a relatively quick response to the new illegal/harmful information that circulates each day.
2. Results of investigation on individual discussion points
(1) Legal liability concerning voluntary countermeasures by electronic bulletin board administrators a. Legal liability of electronic bulletin board administrators in leaving information posted by others.
The scope of legal liability for electronic bulletin board administrators who have left information which, through its distribution, might harm the rights of others or their interests as protected in the law, is regulated under article 3-1 of the Law on Restrictions on the Liability for Damages of Specified Telecommunications Service Providers and the Right to Demand Disclosure of Identity Information of the Sender (referred to below as the Provider Liability Limitation Law.). There is no liability on the part of electronic bulletin board administrators with regard to the flow of information which, by its distribution, does not cause harm to the rights of others or their interests as protected by the law.
Looking at examples of court cases, criminal liability is not established just by electronic bulletin board administrators leaving illegal information, and doing so simply knowing this to be illegal, but by the recognition that the administrators actively contributed to the distribution of the information. But the extent of “contribution” needed to establish liability is not clear, and it is necessary to observe trends in court cases closely in the future.
b. Legal liability in cases where electronic bulletin board administrators have taken measures to prevent the transmission of information posted by others
When measures are taken to prevent the transmission of information by electronic bulletin board administrators, there may be civil liability in cases where conditions of obligations not being carried out or illegal activity are fulfilled.
However, there is no civil liability where the measures for preventing transmissions are based on the contract. Also, the prevention of transmission of illegal information is understood not to be included in liabilities associated with self-defense or emergency defense.
In cases where measures have been taken to stop transmission in error of information that is not illegal, it is understood that there is no liability if there was sufficient cause to believe that information to be harmful, or there is no bad faith or negligence.
There may be criminal liability in cases where measures to prevent the transmission of information by electronic bulletin board administrators constitute part of a criminal offense.
However, there is no criminal liability where the measures for preventing transmissions are based on the contract. Also, the prevention of transmission of illegal information is understood not to be included in liabilities associated with self-defense or emergency defense.
In cases where measures have been taken to stop transmission in error of information that is not illegal, intent is hindered and there is no criminal liability if there was a mistaken belief that such transmissions were illegal.
(2) Proposals for dealing with illegal information on the Internet
a. Measures to provide support to electronic bulletin board administrators to determine the illegality of information
It would be possible to promote measures to prevent the transmission of illegal information and provide support to electronic bulletin board administrators in determining illegality by putting together a system that would allow them to determine this accurately and simply. This would be done through organizations (structures) that have the specialized knowledge and experience to carry out the investigations and come up with appropriate decisions on the illegality of the information distributed.
In concrete terms, along with displaying examples and standards for determining illegal information, support can be provided to measures by electronic bulletin board administrators in preventing transmissions by formulating guidelines to deal with illegal information. These would contain steps for addressing the issues that can be referred to by electronic bulletin board administrators with regard to requests for measures to prevent transmissions from organizations such as the police, which have specialized knowledge concerning the interpretation of laws on illegal information that harms social interests protected by the law and applications regarding concrete examples.
(3) Proposals for dealing with harmful information on the Internet
a. Policies to support countermeasures against information that violates public order and morals
Whether a particular piece of information is seen as harmful or not depends on the recipient, and there is therefore a need to investigate cautiously the setting of uniform standards and spurring of voluntary countermeasures with regard to contracts between electronic bulletin board administrators and users.
On the other hand, however, taking into consideration the fact that, in recent years, there have been cases of illegal incidents resulting from opportunities offered by information distributed on the Internet, it would be appropriate to give support to the prevention of transmissions by electronic bulletin board administrators with regard to information that violates public order and morals, by laying out a format in the shape of a model contract on the part of telecommunications carriers organizations.
b. Policies to support countermeasures against information harmful to young people
With regard to countermeasures for specific groups such as young people, the determination of what information is harmful differs according to the user and it therefore seems that the introduction of filtering to select information on the user side would be an effective countermeasure.
On the other hand, knowledge and penetration concerning filtering remain at low levels despite promotional activities on the part of various organizations. Along with continuing to promote activities to educate and greater penetration, with a view to promoting the use of filtering, reviews of filtering services that meet the needs of users are expected.
In addition, there is a need to increase the awareness of parents and educators concerning the safe and secure use of the Internet, in order to protect young people from harmful information. So, there is a need to actively promote educational activities aimed at these people.
(4) Proposals regarding a sender information disclosure system
With regard to the disclosure of sender information as stipulated in article 4 of the Provider Liability Limitation Law, the following issues come up: (a.) misunderstandings regarding the system, (b.) confusion on determining conditions, (c.) non-use of a civil preservation system, and (d.) confusion on determining operators that would be concerned with demands for sender information disclosure.
With regard to (a.) and (b.), taking as reference court cases that deal with sender information, the provision of action directives for electronic bulletin board administrators through the formulation at telecommunications carriers organizations of guidelines concerning the disclosure of sender information that include an easy-to-understand procedure, so that the person whose rights have been harmed can obtain the disclosure of sender information, would be an effective policy to bring rapid relief to victims of infringement of their rights while considering the senderfs legal rights.
In addition, with regard to (c.) and (d.), measures that would widely spread knowledge should be investigated.
(5) Anonymity on the Internet
Whereas one side of anonymity on the Internet is that it promotes freedom of expression, another side is that it encourages the transmission of illegal and harmful information. There are also methods for preserving anonymity at various levels on the Internet, making it very difficult to eliminate anonymity altogether.
With regard to anonymity on the Internet, when voluntary measures by electronic bulletin board administrators are not a sufficient countermeasure to illegal and harmful information and the reason for this is the existence of anonymity on the Internet, there could be an investigation so as to grasp the reason why anonymity has become a problem, and consider the possibilities for technical or economic countermeasures that could be taken in response, while taking fully into consideration the freedom of expression through anonymity, and the relationship with confidentiality in communications.
(6) Information transmitted from overseas
With regard to information that is transmitted by servers located overseas, Japanese providers do not have the possibility of managing these servers and it is technically difficult for them to take any effective measures.
Also, international cooperation is complicated as there are cases where information complies with laws in the country where the server is located, but is illegal in Japan, making it difficult to deal with it through criminal investigation organizations. On the other hand, with regard to information such as child pornography which is also illegal in the country where the server is installed, effective countermeasures can be taken through international cooperation between criminal investigation organizations in the various countries, as well as hotlines that receive calls from general users.
The Internet Hotline Center started operating in Japan in June 2006 and it is expected that international cooperation will take place in the future through that organization.Summary
In the future, it is desirable, based on support by the administration with regard to illegal/harmful information on the Internet, and taking into consideration the proposals made by this study group, to encourage voluntary countermeasures by telecommunications carriers and users, and put in place an environment in which everyone can benefit from the convenience of the Internet while giving maximum consideration to freedom of expression.
Communications Industry Forecasts of Business Conditions
-- The Results (Prompt Report) of July 2006 Survey on "Overall Results of Japan's Communications Industry" --
-The sales forecast diffusion index (DI) *1 shows: the telecommunications business continues to be in "plus" (meaning that a majority of operators expecting an increase of sales.). Commercial broadcasters remain in "minus." Cable TV operators continue to be in "plus."
-The business conditions diffusion index (DI)*2 shows: Telecommunications carriers and cable TV operators continue to be in "plus" (meaning that a majority of operators expecting an increase of business conditions.). Commercial broadcasters continue to be in "minus".
*1. Sales forecast diffusion indices (DIs) : the "percentage points of companies saying that their sales amounts are increasing compared to the previous quarter" minus the "percentage points of companies saying that their sales amounts are decreasing compared to the previous quarter."
*2. Business conditions diffusion indices (DIs): the "percentage points of companies saying that business conditions are improving compared to the previous quarter" minus the "percentage points of companies saying that business conditions are worsening compared to the previous quarter."
Business conditions forecasts
The survey on business trends in the telecommunications industry
The “overall result of Japan’ s communication industry” is designed to grasp the business trends in the communications industry (telecommunications and broadcasting). The survey has been carried out on sales, sales forecasts etc. since April 1995.Businesses surveyed
The number of surveyed businesses for each type of business (telecommunications carriers and broadcasters) is calculated proportionally with the type’ s share in revenues for FY2005. To be statistically significant, the sampling number, as calculated from the number of parent populations in the communications industry, is set at 133. The businesses surveyed are sampled in descending order from the one with the largest sales down to the 133rd one.Survey method
Conducted by questionnaires (mailing of survey card, responses by businesses via fax or the Internet).Survey items
Sales, financial position and business conditions forecasts (conducted only in July, October, January and April*) and sales (every month). * Reporting sales forecast, etc., as of June, September, December, and March next monthResponse rate