Local Public Financial Bureau(LPFB)

Roles of regional finance

The administration linked closely to citizens' lives, such as welfare, school education, fire defense, roads, rivers, and other social infrastructures, is conducted in most cases by local government. Regional finance therefore plays an extremely important position, so to speak, as one of the two wheels of a vehicle together with national finance. Consequently, the regional finance for fiscal 2008 totaled 83.4 trillion yen, topping the nation's general account of 83.1 trillion yen.
Increasingly important will be the roles of local governments and accompanying financial measures, such as promoting regional decentralization, implementing nursing-care insurance designed for the society with a declining birthrate and ageing, and enhancing regional welfare.

Regional finance today (Fig. A)

Fig. A

Regional finance is the totality of the finance of about 1,800 local governments, most of which are financially weak municipalities. The shortage of funds for regional finance increased swiftly in and after fiscal 1994 due to the decline in local tax revenues, tax cuts, and for other reasons, culminating in a figure of about 17 trillion yen in fiscal 2003. Fund shortages have since been on a downward trend, but fiscal 2008 continued to see a major fund shortage as large as 5 trillion yen.
Moreover, the balance of loans in regional finance grew rapidly in recent years due to the decline in local tax revenues, compensations for tax cuts, and the increased issuance of local bonds. The end of fiscal 2008 saw the loans grow to 197 trillion yen, accounting for 37.4% of GDP. This marked a 2.8-fold increase since fiscal 1991, showing an increase of 127 trillion yen.

Distribution of tax sources between the central and local governments (Fig. B)

Fig. B

The breakdown of the taxes borne by the citizens indicates a ratio of national and local taxes at about 3 to 2. To ensure a balance of funds between regions, a certain percentage of the national taxes is given to regions as a local allocation tax, with its uses unidentified. Moreover, subsidies and other national treasury disbursements, generally with their uses identified, are disbursed to the regions, so that the final expenses have reversed themselves to a national-to-regional ratio of about 2 to 3. Thus, the funds provided for local governments to implement their projects are transferred from the national to the regional budget.

Fund security through regional financial planning

The LPFB ensures funds for local governments through regional financial planning (a set of plans that grasp in general the scale of regional finance, which is the financial complex of various local governments, and balance prospects) to allow local governments to carry their important responsibilities regardless of the regional gaps depending on the degree of population and industrial density and regardless of the gaps in tax revenues between fiscal years due to business trends. Through local allocation taxes and local bonds, along with other means, the AFB ensures funds for the local public bodies.

Funding measures through local bonds

The annual expenditures of local governments are, as a rule, covered by annual revenues other than local bonds (loans obtained by local governments). However, for expenses for construction projects and other expenses, which should desirably be borne by future inhabitants, or for disasters and other situations temporarily requiring significant expenses, local bonds can be used a fund source. The LPFB drafts a local bond plan for each fiscal year, thereby determining projections for local bonds to be issued and, through agreement on bond making and other clerical work, distributing limited local bond funds.

Planning and drafting programs for local public enterprises

The LPFB plans and drafts programs, takes financial measures, gives advice, and renders related services regarding local public enterprises.
[Roles of local public enterprises]
Local public enterprises provide projects for waterworks, traffic, hospitals, and sewage, and other services indispensable to the lives of regional inhabitants and to the development of the regions (9,317 projects at the end of fiscal 2006).
[Size of settled accounts of local public enterprises (fiscal 2006)]
The settled accounts of all the local public enterprises total 19 trillion 301.2 billion yen, accounting for about 20% of the settled accounts of the expenditure of the ordinary account of all the local public associations.

Fund adjustment through local allocation taxes

Local governments should ideally be financed by their own funds, such as local taxes collected by themselves. However, in reality, fund sources are regionally unevenly distributed. A mechanism is therefore needed for adjusting this uneven distribution and for ensuring general fund sources (fund sources with their uses unidentified and which can be used for any kind of expenses) to organizations with low local tax revenues. Established for that purpose is the local allocation tax.
The local allocation taxes for fiscal 2008 total 15 trillion 406.1 billion yen.

Making regional finance healthy

At the end of fiscal 2008, the balance of loans in regional finance reached 197 trillion yen, marking a 2.8-fold increase from fiscal 1991, showing an increase of 127 trillion yen. Under these financial circumstances, the LPFB is expected to draft regional financial plans and engage in other activities, thereby securing the fund sources necessary for addressing such important political challenges as enhancing regional welfare and securing everyday life-related social capital (both of these are challenges facing local governments). While doing so, the LPFB is expected to present a road map for thoroughly saving and rationalizing unnecessary and un-urgent expenses, thereby playing its role as a leader in making regional finance healthy.

Keyphrase

"Expenditure-revenue collective reforms"

Japanese finance today is estimated at about 778 trillion yen (at the end of fiscal 2008) in the balance of long-term debts, as the combined figure for national and regional debts, meaning it remains in an extremely severe situation. In an attempt to put the basic financial balance of the national and regional treasuries combined at the beginning of the 2010s, therefore, the national and regional governments are supposed to conduct expenditure-revenue collective reforms with the national and regional governments remaining in step.
In the ongoing debate concerning expenditure-revenue collective reforms, it is necessary to deliberate on wideranging issues regarding the division of roles between the central and regional governments, central government interference in regional work, and other issues facing the administrative and financial programs of the central and regional governments regarding collective reforms in reviewing the allocation of tax resources including subsidies, local allocation taxes and transfer of tax revenue sources.
In any event, it will remain necessary to conduct thorough reviews of expenditures through national and regional governments in an attempt to make regional finance healthy. Moreover, that is the major precondition for obtaining the citizens' understanding of the expenditure-revenue collective reforms.